Test your NTM Knowledge

Antoinette: a 54-year-old female, ex-smoker with no drug allergies, presents with a recent history of persistent irritating cough and possible gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) over the last 3–4 months

Test your NTM Knowledge

Romy: a 25-year-old female with cystic fibrosis and ongoing pancreatic insufficiency, with lung function decline, diffuse bronchiectasis and intermittent exacerbations requiring IV antibiotic therapy

faderindicatorfaderindicator

Get Involved — test your knowledge

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a group of bacteria which are responsible for causing NTM pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) in susceptible patients. NTM-PD is chronic and can be debilitating but is unfortunately often misdiagnosed as disease awareness has been low. Find out how much you know about NTM by taking the quiz below!

Antoinette - Question 1

 

2015: A 54-year-old female, ex-smoker with no drug allergies, presents with a recent history of persistent irritating cough and possible gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) over the last 3–4 months, characterized by a dry cough and frequent nighttime awakenings.

Initially, the GP decides to treat with a cough medicine (2 different drugs) but without any benefit.

After this initial treatment attempt, the GP refers the patient:

  • to ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialist who diagnoses acute pharyngolaryngitis.
  • to a gastroenterologist who diagnoses possible GERD in the context of suspected hiatal hernia.

As a result, the GP prescribes omeprazole as well as Vitamin A and E supplementation.

Symptoms slowly improve after several months and the patient stops treatment and follow up.

August 2020: Patient returns with a typically dry, persistent cough with minimal expectoration of sputum, frequent attacks of coughing at night, some nasal congestion and recurrent oppressive retrosternal pain.

Patient is referred again to ENT specialist who diagnoses acute laryngitis and prescribes lansoprazole 15 mg, an antihistamine and nasal corticosteroid. 

Based on this history what alternative diagnosis would you consider at this point?

Please tick all that apply.

There is insufficient information to make an alternative diagnosis

Evidence for answers

  • Symptoms in this patient could suggest an issue with environmental allergy, although the history does not detail any pets, or issue relating to her environment specifically.
  • Cough and oppressive thoracic pain could also suggest asthma but there is not enough information about personal and family history.
  • The lack of expectorated sputum suggests that a lung infection may not be the issue at this point, but we do not have an overview of her respiratory condition.

Antoinette - Question 2

 

November 2020: Patient returns to clinic with no improvement in cough after 2 months of treatment (lansoprazole, antihistamine and nasal corticosteroid). She has increasing thoracic pain when breathing, wheezing and dyspnea.

Patient is referred to Gastroenterology where a gastroscopy and biopsy are performed in order to rule out gastric infection by Helicobacter pylori.

Results:

  • Esophageal mucosa is normal, with evidence of a mild hiatus hernia but gastric biopsy is negative for pylori.

What would be your next steps in treatment for this patient?

Please tick all that apply.

Refer to a pulmonologist

Evidence for answers

  • The patient is an ex-smoker and has a persistent cough leading to the suspicion of COPD; however, she does not have a typical history of COPD with progressive and increasing breathlessness, expectorated sputum or frequent chest infections.
  • On the other hand, whilst test for pylori infection was negative, she has a mild hiatus hernia and respiratory symptoms, still suggestive of a GERD-related cough. GERD can be a risk factor for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE) although she is relatively young at 54-years-of-age.
  • A pulmonologist might at this point have ordered a CT scan and ruled out COPD and/or NCFBE.

Antoinette - Question 3

 

December 2020: Patient continues to experience persistent, intense coughing, but now has developed more severe wheezing and dyspnea.

  • Patient is started on β2-agonist bronchodilator (Atrovent 2 puffs/8 hours) and referred for thoracic CT scan.
    • Thoracic CT scan shows diffuse central airway thickening and bilateral cylindrical bronchiectatic nodules in all lobes.
  • After seeing the CT results the GP
    • adds: inhaled burdesonide/formoterol, azithromycin, mucolytic
    • refers to a pulmonologist

Do you agree with the therapeutic decisions taken by the GP?

Please tick all that apply.

No, I would retain β2-agonist bronchodilator and refer to a pulmonologist

Evidence for answers

  • The prescription of macrolides in bronchiectasis patients should be carefully considered; in particular an ECG, hearing tests and repeated sputum cultures should be performed in order to screen for contraindications to macrolides use and to rule out NTM infections that should never be treated with monotherapy (macrolides only)
  • In patients with persistent cough and bronchiectasis, the risk of NTM infection has to be considered and inhaled corticosteroids are not indicated.
  • In consideration of the long-term clinical history of cough and increasing dyspnea and high risk of NTM a referral to a pulmonologist with expertise in respiratory infections is desirable.

Antoinette - Question 4

 

December 2020: At the pulmonology clinic, patient has minimal wheezing at forced expiration and an intense irritating non-productive cough, there is no recent spirometry (since 2015) and no sputum culture.

What is your next treatment decision?

Please tick all that apply.

Retain β-agonist, remove inhaled corticosteroid and antibiotic, undertake full lung function tests and sputum culture from 3 separately obtained sputum samples

Evidence for answers

  • Lung function tests are recommended to assess all chronic respiratory disease in order to decide the appropriate therapy
  • A diagnosis of bronchiectasis has been done having compatible symptoms and radiological signs (bronchiectatic nodules on thoracic CT scan, along with persistent cough and wheeze)1
  • In this patient the presence of an intractable cough and dyspnea are also suggestive of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD), other key diagnostic symptoms for NTM-PD include underlying lung disease, weight loss, fatigue and fever.2 An active NTM infection should be ruled out by repeated sputum cultures as suggested by the 2020 International guideline.3 
  • Inhaled corticosteroids should not be initiated when NTM are suspected due to increased risk of disease spread.

Antoinette - Question 5

 

December 2020–February 2021: Spirometry shows a mild obstructive pattern with an FVC of 81%, FEV1 of 73% and Tiffeneau Index of FEV1/FVC of 69%.

Culture results from 3 consecutive, separate sputum samples show culture positive acid-fast bacilli, that are positive for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC).

What is your next treatment decision?

Please tick all that apply.

 

Antibiogram for susceptibility testing for macrolides and amikacin

Evidence for answers

  • Guidelines for NTM-PD published in 2020,1 indicate that in patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for NTM-PD treatment with antimicrobial therapy should be initiated over a ‘watch and wait’ approach. However, the decision to treat needs to consider the infecting NTM species and individual patient wishes. In one study in patients with MAC-PD disease progression was evident in 97.5% of patients who were untreated over 6 years.2
  • If treatment is delayed patients should still receive training on techniques such as airway clearance and vaccination (e.g. influenza) to control sputum and related symptoms and prevent respiratory infection.3
  • Once NTM infection is identified, patients with MAC or kansasii should undergo antimicrobial susceptibility testing.1 For MAC patients should be tested for macrolide and amikacin susceptibility.1
  • Once a decision to treat MAC-PD has been made patients without cavities or severe disease should be treated with macrolide containing triple therapy.1 Ideally, the macrolide should be azithromycin.
  • The guideline recommended treatment regimen for MAC-PD is azithromycin 250–500 mg/day ethambutol 15 mg/kg/day, rifampicin 10 mg/kg/day (or 450 mg or 650 mg/day).1 For patients with nodular bronchiectatic disease for intermittent dosing three times a week (azithromycin 500 mg/day, ethambutol 25 mg/kg/day, rifampicin 600 mg/day).1

Romy - Question 1

 

Romy is a 25-year-old female, diagnosed with cystic fibrosis shortly after birth following an intestinal obstruction (sweat test for chloride = 111 mmol/L [see www.cff.org for more details]) and has suffered ongoing pancreatic insufficiency.

Respiratory history shows lung function decline with peri-bronchial wall thickening, diffuse bilateral bronchiectasis with intermittent exacerbations requiring IV antibiotic therapy every 2–3 years.

In 2009 Romy was diagnosed with allergy to dust and aspergillus and was treated for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) twice with steroids and antifungals.

She has had frequent, but minor, episodes of haemoptysis and reported erythema nodosum with joint pain/swollen joints which were antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive.

Since 2011 she has had chronic infections with Staphylococcus aureus, susceptible and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas and Scedosporium apiospermum.

Over her long-life chronic treatment, she has suffered different iatrogenic conditions:

  • First, she had acute renal failure with tubulointerstitial nephritis secondary to ciprofloxacin treatment for infection
  • Secondly, she suffered hallucinations following voriconazole treatment for Scedosporium apiospermum

In 2019, she presents with increasing sputum production and purulence and a culture reports acid-fast staining bacilli, positive for Mycobacterium kansasii, Scedosporium apiospermum, Scedosporium boydii and Candida albicans. 

What do you consider is the potential driver of clinical worsening in this patient?

Please tick all that apply.

M. kansasii

Evidence for answers

  • The presence of fungi in sputum culture of CF patients does not always requires treatment. In this patient fungal chronic infection had been described since 2009. Treatment for Scedosporium apiospermum in patients with CF is suggested for those for whom symptoms of infection are not responding to antibacterial therapy, or growth of Scedosporium apiospermum is persistently noted in culture.1 However, Scedosporium apiospermum is known to be highly resistant to many antifungals and so voriconazole is used in preference to other candidates. In this patient voriconazole caused hallucinations, and whilst it is not known if she is resistant to other anti-fungals, unless her Scedosporium apiospermum infection is considered to be driving her symptoms, it would be sensible to treat the kansasii infection first.
  • The recent sputum culture did not show increased bacterial load by Pseudomonas and /or Staphylococcus aureus. In specialised CF units quantitative cultures are typically requested in order to better investigate correlation between clinical status and microbiological findings. Additionally, the impact of eventual antibiotic therapies has to be considered to interpret sputum cultures.
  • In young CF patients adherence to treatment2,3 can be inconsistent and should always be assessed as a result; however in this case there is insufficient information to understand clearly the adherence in this patient.
  • As this patient has demonstrated culture positivity for kansasii, treatment of this infection should be the focus, as isolation of M. kansasii is considered to always be indicative of active disease.

References:

  1. Noni M et al. Mycoses 2017;9:594–99.
  2. Quittner AL et al. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2016 ;22(2):187–91.
  3. Goldbeck L et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 18;2014(6):CD003148.

Romy - Question 2

.

From this patient history and CT scans, what antibiotic susceptibility testing would you undertake?

Please tick all that apply.

macrolide, aminoglycoside, ethambutol, rifampicin

Evidence for answers

Antibiotic

Susceptibility

Amikacin

S

Ciprofloxacin

R

Clofazimine

S

Clarithromycin

S

Doxycycline

R

Ethambutol

S

Ethionamide

I

Isoniazid

S

Rifabutin

S

Rifampicin

S

Streptomycin

R

Cycloserine

R

 

M. kansasii is an aggressive virulent form of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Aggressive therapy for M. kansasii pulmonary disease (MK-PD) is recommended as it is associated with a high risk of mortality.1

In a study of 109 patients with MK-PD 64% had radiographic progression within 1 year and a 1-year mortality rate of 43% with a median survival of only 71 days.1

Factors considered to be prognostic for radiographic progression include acid-fast smear grade ≥3, plus CLOUD factors; fibroCavitary disease, Leucocyte count >9,000 μL, Old age (>65 years), pUre M. kansasii in sputum (no other mycobacterium identified) and no presence of Diabetes mellitus.1

Guidelines published in 2020 for NTM-PD recommend that treatment for M. kansasii is implemented after first culture positivity and that before treatment patients should be tested for rifampicin susceptibility.2

References:

  1. Liu C-J et al. Resp Med 2019;151:19–26
  2. Daley CL et al. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2000535 

Romy - Question 3

 

Antibiotic

Susceptibility

Amikacin

S

Ciprofloxacin

R

Clofazimine

S

Clarithromycin

S

Doxycycline

R

Ethambutol

S

Ethionamide

I

Isoniazid

S

Rifabutin

S

Rifampicin

S

Streptomycin

R

Cycloserine

R

 

What treatment strategy would you implement based on the history and antibiogram obtained?

Please tick all that apply.

rifampicin 300 mg b.i.d. (600 mg/day), azithromycin 500 mg/day OR isoniazid 300 mg/day, ethambutol 15 mg/kg/day

Evidence for answers

As described in the 2020 International guideline:

  • in patients with rifampicin-susceptible kansasii pulmonary disease, we suggest a regimen of rifampicin, ethambutol, and either isoniazid or macrolide
  • neither parenteral amikacin nor streptomycin should be used routinely for treating patients with kansasii pulmonary disease.

Ongoing medications

Omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d.

Polyethylene glycol plus mineral salts 13.8g b.i.d.

Pancreatin 25,000 8 capsules over 24 hours

Multivitamin/minerals 1 capsule every 24 hours

Calcium carbonate and Vitamin D 1/2 (500 mg calcium carbonate [25 mEq Calcium equivalent] and 400 IU Vitamin D)

Calcifediol (Vitamin D3) 266 μg/1.5 mL ampoule (oral liquid administration)

Inhaled olodaterol/tiotropium 2.5/2.5 μg 2 puffs in 24 hours

Inhaled salbutamol 0.1 mg 2 puffs

Acetylcysteine 600 mg

Inhaled hypertonic saline/hyaluronic acid b.i.d.

Lactobacillus 1.5g daily

 

Newly prescribed medications

Daily

Oral azithromycin 500 mg/day

Oral rifampicin 300 mg b.i.d.

Oral ethambutol 400 mg b.i.d.

On alternate days

Inhaled colistin 1,662,600 IU

Oral amikacin 500 mg/day

Guidelines published in 2020 for NTM-PD recommend that treatment for M. kansasii should be rifampicin based and given the uncertain value of isoniazid, macrolides are increasingly included.1 The guideline recommends a multi-drug regimen of rifampicin, ethambutol and either isoniazid or macrolide. In this case, as this is the first isolation of M. kansasii and she demonstrates susceptibility to clarithromycin (and therefore azithromycin) inclusion of a macrolide would be appropriate. Guidelines do not recommend the addition of amikacin or streptomycin when a rifampicin-based triple therapy including ethambutol and a macrolide or isoniazid can be used.1 In this patient additional antibiotics of inhaled colistin and oral amikacin 500 mg/day are included with a view to targeting the Pseudomonas infection including MDR strains. Inhaled colistin is recommended in patients with CF or bronchiectasis and Pseudomonas infection.2,3 New infections with Pseudomonas in patients with CF are likely to progress to chronic infection which is associated with worsening lung function, so prompt therapy is indicated.3

 

References:

  1. Daley CL et al. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2000535
  2. Polverino E et al. Eur Respir J 2017;50:1700629
  3. Castellani C et al. J Cyst Fibros 2018;17:153–78

Romy - Question 4

From the CT scan what key radiological features do you see?

Please tick all that apply.

Bilateral bronchiectasis with wall thickening in upper lobes, with centrilobular lingula micronodules

Evidence for answers

In this patient, the CT scan shows:

  • bilateral bronchiectasis with wall thickening in upper lobes, with centrilobular lingula micronodules
  • air trapping
  • appearance of a new cavitary nodular lesion in the upper right lobe
  • distal mucous plugging

Radiographical presentation of M. kansasii can be extremely diverse and so monitoring for disease or treatment success must also include sputum mycobacterial culture.1 A study in patients with M. kansasii suggests that patients have a high level of unilateral cavitation and a higher likelihood of right upper lobe disease.2 An early study indicated that the appearance of pleural effusion of adenopathy is rare;3 and this is supported by more recent data.2

References:

  1. Cattachmanchi A et al. Chest 2008;133:875–80
  2. Matveychuk A et al. Resp Med 2012;106:1472–77
  3. Christensen EE et al. Am J Roentgenol 1978;131:985–93

Romy - Question 5

 

TREATMENT FOLLOW UP

At 3 months follow-up the patient had a worsening of clinical symptoms, with increasing dyspnoea and volume of expectorated sputum. Concomitantly FVC% had fallen from 3.79 L to 3.33 L and FEV1 from 3.09 to 2.66 L.

After complete examination and patient interview, it was clear the patient had stopped taking rifampicin due to urine red colour and inhaled antibiotics as she considered the administration to be too time consuming.

Given the additional information at treatment follow up, what would be your approach now?

Please tick all that apply.

Insist on greater treatment compliance and step up follow-up and monitoring with a new CT scan

Evidence for answers

Rifampicin is not recommended on alternate days in presence of cavitary disease.1 Inhaled antibiotics are directed at reducing bacterial load of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this patient, bronchodilator treatment was optimised as it had previously been established and maintained over many years. Patient adherence is crucial in the management of NTM pulmonary infection; given that the CT scan showed a new nodular lesion at upper right lobe the need to continue appropriate therapy is confirmed.

References:

  1. Daley CL et al. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2000535